Archive for June, 2008

the end of the american system of justice as we know it

June 21, 2008

The RIAA has ben dominating the united states ditrict courts with numerous lawsuits over file sharing of music.  Now, the MPAA has joined the RIAA in advancing a point of view calculated to destroy american jurisprudence:

“The Motion Picture Association of America said Friday intellectual-property holders should have the right to collect damages, perhaps as much as $150,000 per copyright violation, without having to prove infringement.”

Throw out the US constitution, the united states code, the federal rules of civil procedure as well, while you’rea at it.


more money for music artists

June 18, 2008

In case you missed it, the Bush Administration joined Democratic and Republican predecessors in supporting “The Performance Rights Act” (H.R. 4789) as “a matter of fairness and equity.”

In the Department of Commerce’s letter to Congressman Howard Berman, chairman, Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property, the DOC stated that this legislation is “an appropriate and workable approach to providing compensation to recording artists and record labels for the transmission of their works by over-the-air broadcast stations.”

The endorsement came shortly before Chairman Berman’s subcommittee held a hearing on the legislation where famed recording artist Nancy Sinatra testified on behalf of the musicFIRST Coalition, along with Tom Lee, president of the American Federation of Musicians.


June 18, 2008





MAIL:  BOX 4656




what is it about people who create music?

June 9, 2008

Why do people who create music:  write it, play it, etc. have no business sense?  Why will they sign away everything for that first gig, record deal, film score job, band performance?  Why do they fear lawyers, even those on their side?  Why do they want someone else to fight for them even when they won’t do any fighting themselves?  It’s lunacy.  They cling to their midi files and musical instruments, and despair over how people want their music for free.  What do they expect?  It seems to be a holy trinity:  music creators don’t know about the business, they don’t want to know about the business and they don’t want to be told that they ought to want to know about the business.

myths about copyrights in music

June 2, 2008

Dispelling Some Myths About Copyrights In Music

Many of you who write music may have questions about the business side of things.

You’ve probably heard the term “PRO” bandied about. In the music biz, it’s not a short reference to the degree of talent of a musician or other music creator.

So, what’s a PRO? It’s a performance rights organization. It administers part of the copyright in music. Music is a different kettle of fish from other kinds of creative endeavors. When you write a novel, you submit it to a book publisher, who then prints up a lot of copies and sells them in stores or on-line. Royalties payable for the novel are administered and paid to you, the novelist, by your publisher as a general rule.

A movie, as another example can have many aspects of it which generate royalties or payments, however, there is, as to the movie as a whole, only one copyright and the royalties paid attributable to that copyright are usually administered by the distributor of the film or their assignee. From there the money can go to a number of payees depending on individual contracts or master contracts (like with the Screen Actors Guild or other such organization), and ultimately, in theory at least, the money reaches the individual artist (like an actor in a film).

With music, when you create music you also create a copyright embedded within. However, under the law, you cannot protect that copyright unless you register it with the Registrar of Copyrights in D.C.; at least under the U.S. Copyright Law. This is the first thing people don’t understand: yes, the copyright comes into being along with the original creative work, but you cannot protect it legally without registration with D.C. Why? The law says so.

How do you protect copyrights? In the final analysis, you sue people if they infringe (or stomp) on your music and its embedded copyright. And you can only file that lawsuit in a United States District Court. Why? Again, the law says so. And if you do file a lawsuit you have to put it right there clear as day right in the “allegations” of the lawsuit that you registered a copyright in the work in question with the Registrar and “here’s the registration number and the registration date.” Why? Again, the rules for filing lawsuits in federal court say so. On top of that, there’s a rule that says you have to give notice of your copyright infringement lawsuit to the U.S. Copyright Office. Okay, that’s copyright law in a nutshell.

So what is it that PROs do? Well, look at the copyright in your music like a multi-layer cream pie. And you can slice and dice that pie any way you want.

PROs administer a piece of the pie called the performance royalty. That’s only a piece, not the whole pie. And what do they do with that? They sell a license (a right contained in that slice of pie) to something like a broadcaster: a radio broadcast station or network, TV or cable broadcast network or station or now, a webcaster with a website on the world wide web; what they’re really selling is a “do not get sued” card when that broadcaster broadcasts (or in some way, “uses”) your music to the public.

Here’s the trick: if there’s no registration of the copyright with D.C., you (the copyright owner) cannot sue the broadcaster anyway for infringement (i.e.: broadcasting your music without your consent). So, one of the great illusions about how PROs operate: not all of the musical selections they administer in their repertories have been registered with D.C. So, this is rather sneaky: the PRO is selling something to a broadcaster it doesn’t have. But, everybody seems to go along with it anyway because everyone assumes that if the PRO says it’s in its repertory, then all assume that the PRO has all the rights necessary to effect the license.

So, that is, in a nutshell how copyright dovetails with how PROs work.

Do PROs administer all of the copyright? No, only a specific slice of the copyright pie. There is another big slice called a “mechanical” which is usually the rights you have in a sound recording made of the music you created. That royalty is usually administered by the record label on which the recording was made, or its assignee, which could be the Harry Fox Agency for the United States. Mechanical royalties are the kinds of royalties made when a copy of the music on a sound recording is sold, usually at retail, either in the form of a physical disc of some kind, physical tape of some kind, or, these days, by way of a download of the music over the internet from a provider to a consumer.

This is all a rather simplistic explanation, but essentially this is how the copyright pie is split.

It becomes more complex when you’re looking at the international distribution or broadcasting of music since some countries, like France, have something called a broadcast-mechanical which is a little bit of a performance royalty and a little bit of a mechanical royalty. Here’s how that can work: broadcaster plays your music over its network. Broadcaster pays a license fee to SACEM (the French equivalent to ASCAP). SACEM splits it up. The performance royalty ultimately payable to you is, finally, after a time period, paid over by SACEM to your PRO here in the USA. Let’s say, ASCAP. ASCAP doesn’t get any part of the mechanical. ASCAP doesn’t even know, so I’ve been told, what the gross amount of the royalty paid by the broadcaster was. ASCAP gets a net payment from SACEM, takes its cut off the top and then pays you the rest, theoretically.

Where does the mechanical go? SACEM pays that directly to the “sub-publisher” of the music in France who represents the USA domestic publisher of the music and that sub-pub pays the mechanical to the USA pub. And here’s a kicker: the USA pub pockets the money and doesn’t report it to anyone else–like you much of the time.

No wonder your head swims when someone wants to discuss the business side of the music business.

And things are going to get more complex. Those who perform music get a piece of the action when a webcaster webcasts music (the webcaster pays a royalty to SoundExchange which then supposedly pays artists but SeX doesn’t represent artists, it represents its constituent labels, the big record labels). Music performers now want a piece of the action on revenue from radio broadcasts of music.

Now, my head is swimming and I’m exhausted.

Anyway, that’s it for now. More in the future.



LOS ANGELES, CA. 91412-4656



the music BUSINESS

June 1, 2008

If you’re a musician, composer, songwriter, singer or player and you’re trying to earn money from what you do, then you’re not only in the music business, you are a music business.  The “biz” is very complex today and will be even more so tomorrow.  There are a lot of things to think about and administer.  Your first decision is whether to do that yourself or hire someone.  If you don’t you will lose more money than if you had hired someone.




Hello world!

June 1, 2008

Welcome to This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!